• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

ThomasBackhaus

Random comments on life, the universe and everything

  • Research
  • Teaching
  • Publications
  • Opinion pieces (English)
    • Acknowledging that Science Is Political Is a Prerequisite for Science‐Based Policy
    • Chemical Risk Assessment: Pressures, Perceptions and Expectations
    • Science and anti-science
    • Communicating environmental science to the public
    • Review of “The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters” by Tom Nichols
  • Debate articles (Swedish)
    • Domen mot COOP går emot vetenskapen
    • EU vågar inte ta strid mot farliga kemikalier
    • Sex steg för att lyckas med säkra nanomaterial
    • Farliga kemikalier måste fasas ut snabbare
    • Kemikalieskatter bidrar till en giftfri miljö
  • Our Chemicalized World
  • Videoclips
  • Who?
    • Overview
    • Environmental Consultancy
You are here: Home / Chemical Regulation / Rebuttal to a Swedish debate article published in Svenska Dagblad

Rebuttal to a Swedish debate article published in Svenska Dagblad

February 14, 2018 by Thomas Leave a Comment

We have just published a rebuttal to a recent debate article on “the cocktail effect” that Martin Larsson (toxicologist from Bayer Crop Sciences in Denmark) published in Svenska Dagblad a couple of days back. In case you are also struggling with SvD’s anti-adblocking mechanism and/or with them pressurizing you to make you pay for viewing our text, I have reprinted the whole rebuttal here.

As usual, comments are highly welcome. Either here, via Twitter or via email…

Thomas

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Filed Under: Chemical Regulation, Chemical Risk Assessment, Pesticides

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

My Tweets

1 hour ago
Thomas Backhaus's Twitter avatar
Thomas Backhaus
@ThoBaSwe

That's almost as brilliant a spin on the mass emigration from the UK government as the previous statement that… t.co/pUpk7GUDPW

  • Reply
  • Retweet 0
  • Like 0
3 hours ago
Thomas Backhaus's Twitter avatar
Thomas Backhaus
@ThoBaSwe

Nachdem ich #Flasspöhler eine halbe Stunde bei @Markus__Lanz zuhören durfte, kann ich @RKiesewetter leider nur zust… t.co/fmYGnnFaLN

  • Reply
  • Retweet 0
  • Like 0
6 hours ago
Thomas Backhaus's Twitter avatar
Thomas Backhaus
@ThoBaSwe

Nailed it... t.co/1jpHuRLIRL

  • Reply
  • Retweet 0
  • Like 0
9 hours ago
Thomas Backhaus's Twitter avatar
Thomas Backhaus
@ThoBaSwe

No surprise, but still... #taxonomy t.co/M4R43aYMp5

  • Reply
  • Retweet 0
  • Like 0
15 hours ago
European Parliament's Twitter avatar
European Parliament
@Europarl_EN

MEPs will today decide whether to veto the European Commission’s plan to include certain nuclear and gas activitie… t.co/nrsXNtI1UY

Retweeted by Thomas Backhaus
  • Reply
  • Retweet 23
  • Like 57

Previous Posts

  • June 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (1)
  • April 2019 (3)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (1)
  • February 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (1)
  • November 2017 (3)
  • October 2017 (3)

Categories

  • Chemical Regulation (2)
  • Chemical Risk Assessment (10)
  • Environmental Politics (1)
  • Glyphosate (4)
  • Misc (1)
  • Our chemicalized world (4)
  • Personal (1)
  • Pesticides (7)
  • Plastic and Microplastic (3)
  • publications (1)
  • Science Communication (3)
  • Uncategorized (3)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2022 · Genesis Sample on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in