• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

ThomasBackhaus

Random comments on life, the universe and everything

  • Research
  • Teaching
  • Publications
  • Opinion pieces (English)
    • Acknowledging that Science Is Political Is a Prerequisite for Science‐Based Policy
    • Chemical Risk Assessment: Pressures, Perceptions and Expectations
    • Science and anti-science
    • Communicating environmental science to the public
    • Review of “The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters” by Tom Nichols
  • Debate articles (Swedish)
    • Domen mot COOP går emot vetenskapen
    • EU vågar inte ta strid mot farliga kemikalier
    • Sex steg för att lyckas med säkra nanomaterial
    • Farliga kemikalier måste fasas ut snabbare
    • Kemikalieskatter bidrar till en giftfri miljö
  • Our Chemicalized World
  • Videoclips
  • Who?
    • Overview
    • Environmental Consultancy
You are here: Home / Archives for Our chemicalized world

Our chemicalized world

Our chemicalized world, episode 0: Intro

April 12, 2019 by Thomas Leave a Comment

This is the introductory episode of “Our Chemicalized World”, a podcast about chemicals and their impacts on human health and the environment. So, this is about chemical hazards, exposures, about risks and safety. About using chemicals and about avoiding them. About testing chemicals for their toxic effects, about measuring and estimating their occurrence in the human body and the environment.

I am starting this activity in order to explore an issue that I find important for all of us, given that we are using synthetic chemicals in every part of our daily life. The problem is that chemical production and use is truly a double-edged sword. So, let’s explore the popular myths, the inconvenient facts and the science behind it.

As usual, feedback is welcome!

Filed Under: Our chemicalized world

  • « Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4

Primary Sidebar

My Tweets

6 hours ago
Thomas Backhaus's Twitter avatar
Thomas Backhaus
@ThoBaSwe

The Risk Assessment Committee of @EU_ECHA supports the proposal to restrict #PFAS in firefighting foams in Europe. t.co/fnWoFeEk2H

  • Reply
  • Retweet 1
  • Like 3
19 hours ago
FragDenStaat.de's Twitter avatar
FragDenStaat.de
@fragdenstaat

Bei @Maischberger behauptete Verkehrsminister #Wissing vor einigen Wochen, sein Expertenbeirat für klimaneutrale Mo… t.co/hGvOd85416

Retweeted by Thomas Backhaus
  • Reply
  • Retweet 745
  • Like 2.6K
3 days ago
Stéphane Horel's Twitter avatar
Stéphane Horel
@stephanehorel

🏭💦 Today a 6-months long public consultation on the EU #PFAS restriction proposal begins. Any citizen can make an i… t.co/Nf9lGpbzV5

Retweeted by Thomas Backhaus
  • Reply
  • Retweet 3
  • Like 10
2 days ago
Johan Rockström's Twitter avatar
Johan Rockström
@jrockstrom

Our Nature Commentary on the need for new economics of water. We are pushing the entire global water cycle out of b… t.co/CPTvfTkoDI

Retweeted by Thomas Backhaus
  • Reply
  • Retweet 131
  • Like 258
1 day ago
Thomas Backhaus's Twitter avatar
Thomas Backhaus
@ThoBaSwe

@NABU_de @ETH Schade, dass #Glyphosat (als Reinstoff) nicht vergleichend auch getestet wurde. Dann hätte man eine b… t.co/1amS56GxlW

  • Reply
  • Retweet 2
  • Like 2

Previous Posts

  • June 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (1)
  • April 2019 (3)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (1)
  • February 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (1)
  • November 2017 (3)
  • October 2017 (3)

Categories

  • Chemical Regulation (2)
  • Chemical Risk Assessment (10)
  • Environmental Politics (1)
  • Glyphosate (4)
  • Misc (1)
  • Our chemicalized world (4)
  • Personal (1)
  • Pesticides (7)
  • Plastic and Microplastic (3)
  • publications (1)
  • Science Communication (3)
  • Uncategorized (3)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2023 · Genesis Sample on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in